What Is Contributory Negligence in Relation to a Car Accident Claim?

Contributory negligence represents a controversial doctrine of common law. Fundamentally, it means that if you were injured in a car accident due, in part, to your failure to use reasonable care, you would not be able to recover any damages from your injury–even if another person’s actions or behavior caused the car accident.

Example of Contributory Negligence in a Car Accident Claim

If Mary is exceeding the speed limit as she drives her kid to school. Dan, who is leaving the school drop-off, fails to judge how fast Mary is driving accurately, thinks he can beat her onto the road, so he taps his brakes at the stop sign and proceeds. Dan hits Mary’s car. Mary wants to recover damages for the injuries like the whiplash she has sustained in the car accident, so she files a claim against Dan. Because Mary’s negligent actions contributed to her injuries, she cannot recover damages under the theory of contributory negligence.

Arizona Uses Comparative Negligence Tests in Car Accident Claims

Juries often ignore contributory negligence rules in cases where the jury members feel that applying this law would lead to grossly unfair results. In response to this controversy, many states, including Arizona, have implemented a “comparative negligence” test to supplement the court’s decisions in these matters.

This test considers the relative percentages of negligence for which each party is accountable. The court uses these percentages to arrive at a fair amount of damage recovery to be paid to each person injured in the car accident.

Arizona’s Application of the Comparative Negligence Test

Arizona’s negligence laws dictate that an injured person can recover damages if he or she is not 100 percent at fault for the injury. A jury could find you to be 99 percent at fault for the injuries you sustain in a car accident and still award you damages.

In this case, the jury will reduce the amount of damages you are awarded by the amount in which you are deemed to be at fault.

Example of how Arizona Courts Apply Comparative Negligence to Car Accident Claims

In the earlier example of the car accident experienced by Mary and Dan, a jury will consider the fact that Dan hit Mary’s car and find that he is 80% at fault for Mary’s injuries. Because Mary was speeding, she is found to be 20% at fault for her injuries. Let’s say the available compensation is $100,000. In Arizona, Mary would not receive the total amount, but rather that amount minus the $20,000 (20% of $100,000) for which she was found to be responsible. In other words, she would receive $80,000 for her injury claim.

For a free legal consultation, call (866) 499-8989

Arizona Laws Change if You Injure Yourself or Someone Else on Purpose

However, if you have intentionally caused or contributed to your injuries, Arizona’s negligence laws block you from receiving any recovery.

Example of Intentional Injury and Its Impact on Damage Recovery in Arizona

So, let’s revisit Dan and Mary in the hospital. We discover that Mary deliberately unfastened her seatbelt the moment she saw the inevitable collision (perhaps in a misguided attempt to collect big bucks in an injury lawsuit), and the majority of her injuries would not have happened had her seatbelt been fastened. In this case, Mary would not be eligible to receive any recovery for her injury.

Arizona’s Right to Contribution Law in a Car Accident

Arizona’s negligence laws also provide for “right to contribution,” which is applied when two or more people are both found to be at fault for another person’s injury. In such situations, everyone responsible for the plaintiff’s injury shares the responsibility for paying damages.

How Arizona Courts Determine Negligence in a Personal Injury Case

Four elements comprise a personal injury case, such as what a plaintiff files to recover damages from a car accident in Arizona.

1. Duty: The Plaintiff rightfully expected some level of duty from the defendant.
2. Breach: The defendant failed to fulfill that duty, by either action or inaction.
3. Cause: This breach resulted in the plaintiff’s injury.
4. Damages: The court can compensate you for your injury.

Arizona’s negligence laws make sense, but the logic can get downright confusing when you are frazzled by the trauma of being in a car accident and preoccupied with your injuries and your bills.

Let Zanes Law steer you in the right direction. We will handle your negligence concerns—and everything else—from A to Z.  Call us today at 866-499-8989 for a free consultation.

Call or text (866) 499-8989 or complete a
Free Case Evaluation form

Car Accidents Blog Posts:

Why Bruce Jenner’s Accident is a Lesson for ALL Drivers Out There

Every media outlet has a scope on the recent and fatal Bruce Jenner car crash.  Many accounts have recalled the incident in varying detail but none look promising for any party involved including the

Phoenix Light Rail Crash

A very major and scary crash recently closed down a major Central and Indian School Road intersection. Although the crash has long been cleared since Saturday, the collision between a

Tracy Morgan Lawsuit Finally Settles

Many fans of the famous (now ended) sitcom, 30 Rock, anxiously followed the news after beloved actor and comedian Tracy Morgan was involved in a trucking accident. A Walmart tractor-trailer

And Then It Happens To You… A Car Accident.

An accident victim who was injured in a car accident in Tucson, Arizona describes her experience in this guest post. You hear about them all the time. You have even witnessed some right in